لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
While the punishment could possibly be severe, its purpose is not really solely to hunt vengeance but to discourage probable offenders and copyright the principles of justice and social order.
Life imprisonment can be an alternative towards the death penalty. In these kinds of cases, the convicted person is sentenced to spend the remainder of their natural life powering bars.
competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
R.O, Office, Gujranwala and the police officials did not inform him that the identification parade on the accused has not been conducted but. In the moment case, now the accused tried to acquire advantage of This system aired by SAMAA News, wherein the image with the petitioner was extensively circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity with the accused through electronic media. The regulation lends assurance to your accused that the identity should not be exposed to the witnesses, particularly for that witness to establish the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer place a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and produced photos. Moreover, the images shown over the media expose that a mask was not placed over the accused to hide his identity until he was place up for an identification parade. Making photographs on the accused publically, either by showing the same towards the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or plan, would create doubt within the proceedings on the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to be certain that there isn't any probability for that witness to see the accused before going to your identification parade. The accused should not be shown towards the witness in person or through any other mode, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or perhaps the press or electronic media. Given the reasons elaborated previously mentioned, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(two), Cr.P.C.
Reasonable grounds can be found about the record to attach the petitioner with the commission on the alleged offence. Even though punishment on the alleged offence does not fall in the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. however learned Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising outside of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is while in the credit of your petitioner as accused, therefore, case on the petitioner falls while in the exception where bail cannot be granted even from the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, guidance is sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion of the same is hereby reproduced:
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there may very well be one particular or more judgments offered (or website reported). Only the reason for the decision with the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could possibly be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could be adopted within an argument.
The issue here is that an accused may possibly say that they intended to injure the sufferer, but they didn't plan to destroy them. In other words, they could claim that thedeath that resulted mainly because of the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor intended.
Typically, only an appeal accepted from the court of past resort will resolve these types of differences and, For lots of reasons, these types of appeals will often be not granted.
Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, along with case legislation at both the federal and state levels.
Criminal cases During the common regulation tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to your case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Contrary to most civil regulation systems, common legislation systems Stick to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their very own previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decrease courts should make decisions consistent with the previous decisions of higher courts.
This article delves into the intricacies with the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case legislation, to supply a comprehensive understanding of its implications and sensible applications.
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement in the laws, the legal system adheres into the doctrine of stare decisis
115 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account on the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty with the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced. These contain if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established from the government.